Bluehost vs Fatcow

Fatcow vs Bluehost in 2014: Who Has Better Hosting?

In today’s world of cut-throat competition for advertising and the World Wide Web, a key aspect is the best web hosting provider in terms of designing, managing and marketing your website.  In the pursuit of the best web hosting provider for web hosting shoppers, we are putting two mammoth names to the test in this review of BlueHost vs FatCow. If you are debating Fatcow vs Bluehost, this review will help you decide.

Both companies commenced their businesses in the late 90s and hence, the obvious comparison. If one takes a closer look at the features the companies possess, one would find very minor differences and quite a few similarities.  Both BlueHost and FactCow have unlimited bandwidth, unlimited disk space, unlimited email accounts and the like. Talking of the control panels, BlueHost gains an upper hand with cPanel which is definitely familiar to customers while FatCow has vDeck. The technical support that is included in both companies are 24/7 service comprising phone and email, video tutorials provided from BlueHost whereas FatCow lags behind with limited online resources.

Both the companies have free set up and are pioneers in the web service providing market. While FatCow is powered by 100% wind energy, BlueHost boasts of VPS Protection Technology. What’s more, BlueHost has almost 2 million satisfied customers worldwide while FatCow is concentrated mainly in the western U.S.

With regard to popularity, BlueHost excels with world ranking of 12 while FatCow dawdles behind at number 63. However, FatCow subscribers have a reason to celebrate as it is cost effective, being just $49 per year which means FatCow is giving away a fat 50%  discount in its subscription currently while BlueHost comes at a more pocket-pinching $4.95 per month. Comparing other  aspects, it is noteworthy to mention here that FatCow gives a stipulated time period of 30-day money back guarantee while BlueHost doesn’t have any time restriction on its money back. Nevertheless, the My SQL Database for FatCow is unlimited while that of BlueHost is a measly 100 databases. Yet, its leverage lies in the fact that it has such extensive technical support with tutorials and live chat apart from the add-ons such as free domain name, unlimited file transfer and automated backups.

In a nutshell, the Bluehost vs fatcow debate could be a close. However, considering various factors that pique the interest of webmasters–price, core features, server uptime–BlueHost can be a better choice  with its

  • VPS Protection Technology,
  • Extensive technical support including video tutorials,
  • User friendly cPanel, and
  • Concrete5

To emphasize how customer friendly and reputable Bluehost is as a web hosting company, it is important to note that the best blogging company around, WordPress, lists Bluehost as their preferred web hosting provider:

It is notable that WordPress users include companies like Forbes, CNN, and even musicians such as Jay-Z.

It is truly wonderful to be alive and experiencing the leveling-out of the internet, where Mr. Little from a small town can start a blog for a hundred dollars or less that is just as attractive as one using

So, to review the BLuehost vs Fatcow debate, Bluehost is more reputable, has faster load times, and is reccomended by the biggest blog host in the world. Bluehost is what I use to host this blog and all other websites I run.   If you don’t want to sacrifice quality for what amounts to about $15 extra per year, go with Bluehost.



Thanks for reading. Feel free to share or like this article if you found it useful. Happy hosting!